The Post-Dystopian Technorealism of Ted Chiang
Keywords:science fiction, technorealism, utopia, Luddism
In this article, we argue that Ted Chiang’s short stories offer a realist philosophy of technology, one that charts a third course between the techno-pessimism and techno-optimism that characterize the history of philosophizing about technology and much of the speculative fiction about it. We begin by surveying the history of utopian and skeptical approaches to technology in philosophy and speculative fiction. We then move to discuss two of Chiang’s recent stories and use them to articulate the author’s techno-realism. Chiang’s view, as it is developed in these stories, has three features: First, technology is not merely an agent of de-skilling, it can also promote self-knowledge and insight. Second, technology is not only an agent of alienation it can also provide succor and psychological relief. Finally, technology does not necessarily remake us into new beings with new capacities and needs. In many cases, it just gives us further avenues to be what we already were - to act on the tendencies and pursue the needs we always had.
Atwood, M. (1985). The Handmaid’s Tale. Toronto, Canada: McClelland and Stewart.
Auden, W. H. (1969, September 6). Moon Landing. New Yorker, 38–38. https://allpoetry.com/Moon-landing
Bacon, F. (1626/1901). New Atlantis. New York: P.F. Collier & Son.
Bellamy, E. (1888). Looking Backward, 2000-1887. Boston, MA: Ticknor & Co.
Bradbury, R. (1962). Fahrenheit 451. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Burgess, A. (1962). A Clockwork Orange. New York: W. W. Norton.
Chiang, T. (2002). Stories of your life and others. New York: Tor Books.
Chiang, T. (2008). Exhalation: Stories by Ted Chiang. London: Picador.
Collins, S. (2008). The Hunger Games. Scholastic Press.
Danaher, J. (2019). Automation and Utopia: Human Flourishing in a World without Work. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Descartes, R. (1637). Discourse on the Method of Rightly Conducting One’s Reason and of Seeking Truth in the Sciences. 1911, translated and edited by S. Haldane and G. R. T. Ross. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Forster, E. M. (Edward M. (1909). The Machine Stops. Oxford and Cambridge Review, 1–54.
Frischmann, B. M., & Selinger, E. (2019). Re-engineering humanity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Huxley, A. (2004). Brave new world : and, Brave new world revisited. New York: HarperCollins.
Klein, E. (2021, March 30). Transcript: Ezra Klein Interviews Ted Chiang. New York Times, 1–16.
le Guin, U. (1969). Left Hand of Darkness. New York: Ace.
Marcus, H. (2020). Ted Chiang Explains the Disaster Novel We All Suddenly Live In. Electric Literature. https://electricliterature.com/ted-chiang-explains-the-disaster-novel-we-all-suddenly-live-in/
Mill, J. S. (1863). Utilitarianism. London: Longmans, Green and Company.
More, T. (1898). Utopia. London: J.M. Dent.
Morris, W. (1884). How We Live and How We Might Live. First printed in 1887 by London: Commonweal. https://www.marxists.org/archive/morris/works/1884/hwl/hwl.htm
Morris, W. (1891). News from Nowhere, Or, An Epoch of Rest. Boston, MA: Roberts Brothers. https://www.google.com/books/edition/News_from_Nowhere
Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York University Press.
O’Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. Largo, Maryland: Crown.
Orwell, George. (1949). Nineteen Eighty-Four. London: Secker & Warburg.
Piercy, M. (1976). Woman on the Edge of Time. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Rothman, J. (2017, January 5). Ted Chiang’s Soulful Science Fiction. The New Yorker. https://www.newyorker.com/culture/persons-of-interest/ted-chiangs-soulful-science-fiction
Sandel, M. (2007). The Case Against Perfection. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Case_Against_Perfection
Schmitt, C. (1993). The Age of Neutralizations and Depoliticizations (1929). Telos, 1993(96), 130–142. https://doi.org/10.3817/0693096130
Shelley, M. W. (1818). Frankenstein, Or the Modern Prometheus. London: Lackington, Hughes, Harding, Mavor, & Jones.
Sibley, M. Q. (1973). Utopian Thought and Technology. American Journal of Political Science, 17(5), 255–281.
Vallor, S. (2016). Technology and the Virtues: A philosophical guide to a future worth wanting. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Vint, S. (2019, May 25). The Technologies That Remake Us: On Ted Chiang’s “Exhalation: Stories.” LA Review of Books. https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/the-technologies-that-remake-us-on-ted-chiangs-exhalation-stories/
Wells, H. G. (1895). The Time Machine. New York: Henry Holt.
Wells, H. G. (1905). A Modern Utopia. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Wells, H. G. (1923). Men Like Gods. London: MacMillan Company.
Wells, H. G. (1933). The Shape of Things to Come. London: Read Books Ltd.
Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. London: Profile Books.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2022 James Hughes, Nir Eisikovits
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) after publication, while providing bibliographic details that credit JEET (See The Effect of Open Access).