An Ethical Framework for Emerging Technologies
the TEAeM Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55613/jeet.v35i1.147Keywords:
Ethics; technology, future studies, emerging, frameworkAbstract
The inherent nature of uncertainty and the indefinite time horizon of emerging technologies means that their effective ethical governance is not sufficiently addressed by industry and hence society. This paper explores an approach to enhance existing ethical frameworks that can be useful and relevant to new and emerging technologies. We begin with the analysis of literature exploring some of the technical features of each framework and its potential applicability to emerging technologies. Following this, a detailed outline of a broad ethical framework has been proposed using a combination of existing ethical frameworks, namely Anticipatory Technology Ethics plus (ATE+), Ethical Impact Assessment (EIA) and a Futures Studies approach, including empirical insights and stakeholder consultation from an EC funded project called TechEthos. The results of the synthesis of the existing ethical frameworks have led to the development of an enhanced framework called ‘TEAeM’ (TechEthos Anticipatory Ethics Model), which builds on existing tools (rather than replace them) to support the ethical considerations of new and emerging technologies. The usefulness of this framework extends across industry, researchers and policy makers.
References
1. Adomaitis, L., Grinbaum A., Lenzi, D. (June 2022) TechEthos D2.2: Identification and specification of potential ethical issues and impacts and analysis of ethical issues of digital extended reality, neurotechnologies, and climate engineering. TechEthos Project Deliverable to the European Commission. Available at: www.techethos.eu.
2. Bell, W. (1996). The Sociology of the Future and the Future of Sociology. Sociological Perspectives, 39(1), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.2307/1389342
3. Bernstein MJ and Mehnert EW (2022) Policy note: Analysis of expert scenarios addressing ethical implications of the selected technologies. TechEthos Project Deliverable to the European Commission. Available at: www.techethos.eu.
4. Bhalla, N., Cannizzaro, S., Richardson, K., & Brooks, L. (2023). TechEthos Project Deliverable to the European Commission. Available at: www.techethos.eu.
5. Boenink, M., Swierstra, T., & Stemerding, D. (2010). Anticipating the interaction between technology and morality: A scenario study of experimenting with humans in bionanotechnology. Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology, 4(2).
6. Brey, P. A. E. (2012a). Anticipating ethical issues in emerging IT. Ethics and Information Technology, 14(4), 305–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-012-9293-y
7. Brey, P. A. E. (2012b). Anticipatory Ethics for Emerging Technologies. NanoEthics, 6(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-012-0141-7
8. Bucur, M., & Papagno, C. (2023). Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson Disease: A Meta-analysis of the Long-term Neuro-psychological Outcomes. Neuropsychology Review, 33(2), 307–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-022-09540-9
9. Cannizzaro, S., Brooks, L., Richardson, K., Umbrello, S., Bernstein, M., & Adomaitis, L. (2021). TechEthos D2.1 Methodology for ethical analysis, scan results of existing ethical codes and guidelines. TechEthos Project Deliverable to the European Commis-sion. Available at: www.techethos.eu.
10. Melville, N. P., Robert, L., & Xiao, X. (2023). Putting humans back in the loop: An affordance conceptualization of the 4th industrial revolution. Information Systems Journal, 33(4), 733–757. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12422
11. Mepham, B., Kaiser, M., Thorstensen, E., Tomkins, S., & Millar, K. (2006). Ethical Matrix Manual. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology - AGR FOREST METEOROL.
12. Palm, E., & Hansson, S. O. (2006). The case for ethical technology assessment (eTA). Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73(5), 543–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2005.06.002
13. Papa, R., Galderisi, A., Vigo Majello, M. C., & Saretta, E. (2015). Smart and Resilient Cities a Systemic Approach for Developing Cross-Sectoral Strategies in the Face of Climate Change. Tema-Journal of Land Use Mobility and Environment, 8, 19–49. https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/2883
14. Rotolo, D., Hicks, D., & Martin, B. R. (2015). What is an emerging technology? Research Policy, 44(10), 1827–1843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.06.006
15. Sardar, Z. (2010). The Namesake: Futures; futures studies; futurology; futuristic; foresight—What’s in a name? Futures, 42(3), 177–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2009.11.001
16. SATORI CEN Workshop Agreement. (2017). Ethics assessment for research and innovation—Part 2: Ethical impact assessment framework (CEN CWA 17145-2 2017 Workshop Agreement). http://satoriproject.eu/media/CWA17145-23d2017.pdf
17. Stahl, B. C., Heersmink, R., Goujon, P., Flick, C., van den Hoven, J., Wakunuma, K., Ikonen, V., & Rader, M. (2010). Identifying the Ethics of Emerging Information and Communication Technologies: An Essay on Issues, Concepts and Method. International Journal of Technoethics, 1(4), 20–38. https://doi.org/10.4018/jte.2010100102
18. Thornton, A. (2024). Our Futures in Mind Uploading: Public Perceptions and Narratives. Journal of Ethics and Emerging Tech-nologies, 34(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.55613/jeet.v34i1.140
19. Umbrello, S., Vermaas, P., Paca, C., Alliaj, G., Nishi, M., Whittington, A., Jouvenot, F., Bernstein, M.J., Mehnert, W., Buchinger, E., (2022). Tools to develop and advance scenarios dealing with the ethics of new technologies. TechEthos Project Deliverable to the European Commission. Available at: www.techethos.eu.
20. Umbrello, S., Bernstein, M. J., Vermaas, P. E., Resseguier, A., Gonzalez, G., Porcari, A., Grinbaum, A., & Adomaitis, L. (2023). From speculation to reality: Enhancing anticipatory ethics for emerging technologies (ATE) in practice. Technology in Society, 74, 102325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102325
21. Voinov, A., & Bousquet, F. (2010). Modelling with stakeholders. Environmental Modelling & Software, 25(11), 1268–1281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.03.007
22. Wright, D. (2011). A framework for the ethical impact assessment of information technology. Ethics and Information Technology, 13(3), 199–226.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nitika Bhalla, Prof. Laurence Brooks, Dr Sara Cannizzaro , Prof. Kathleen Richardson
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) after publication, while providing bibliographic details that credit JEET (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
