An Ethical Framework for Emerging Technologies

the TEAeM Approach

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55613/jeet.v35i1.147

Keywords:

Ethics; technology, future studies, emerging, framework

Abstract

The inherent nature of uncertainty and the indefinite time horizon of emerging technologies means that their effective ethical governance is not sufficiently addressed by industry and hence society. This paper explores an approach to enhance existing ethical frameworks that can be useful and relevant to new and emerging technologies. We begin with the analysis of literature exploring some of the technical features of each framework and its potential applicability to emerging technologies. Following this, a detailed outline of a broad ethical framework has been proposed using a combination of existing ethical frameworks, namely Anticipatory Technology Ethics plus (ATE+), Ethical Impact Assessment (EIA) and a Futures Studies approach, including empirical insights and stakeholder consultation from an EC funded project called TechEthos. The results of the synthesis of the existing ethical frameworks have led to the development of an enhanced framework called ‘TEAeM’ (TechEthos Anticipatory Ethics Model), which builds on existing tools (rather than replace them) to support the ethical considerations of new and emerging technologies. The usefulness of this framework extends across industry, researchers and policy makers. 

References

1. Adomaitis, L., Grinbaum A., Lenzi, D. (June 2022) TechEthos D2.2: Identification and specification of potential ethical issues and impacts and analysis of ethical issues of digital extended reality, neurotechnologies, and climate engineering. TechEthos Project Deliverable to the European Commission. Available at: www.techethos.eu.

2. Bell, W. (1996). The Sociology of the Future and the Future of Sociology. Sociological Perspectives, 39(1), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.2307/1389342

3. Bernstein MJ and Mehnert EW (2022) Policy note: Analysis of expert scenarios addressing ethical implications of the selected technologies. TechEthos Project Deliverable to the European Commission. Available at: www.techethos.eu.

4. Bhalla, N., Cannizzaro, S., Richardson, K., & Brooks, L. (2023). TechEthos Project Deliverable to the European Commission. Available at: www.techethos.eu.

5. Boenink, M., Swierstra, T., & Stemerding, D. (2010). Anticipating the interaction between technology and morality: A scenario study of experimenting with humans in bionanotechnology. Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology, 4(2).

6. Brey, P. A. E. (2012a). Anticipating ethical issues in emerging IT. Ethics and Information Technology, 14(4), 305–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-012-9293-y

7. Brey, P. A. E. (2012b). Anticipatory Ethics for Emerging Technologies. NanoEthics, 6(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-012-0141-7

8. Bucur, M., & Papagno, C. (2023). Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson Disease: A Meta-analysis of the Long-term Neuro-psychological Outcomes. Neuropsychology Review, 33(2), 307–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-022-09540-9

9. Cannizzaro, S., Brooks, L., Richardson, K., Umbrello, S., Bernstein, M., & Adomaitis, L. (2021). TechEthos D2.1 Methodology for ethical analysis, scan results of existing ethical codes and guidelines. TechEthos Project Deliverable to the European Commis-sion. Available at: www.techethos.eu.

10. Melville, N. P., Robert, L., & Xiao, X. (2023). Putting humans back in the loop: An affordance conceptualization of the 4th industrial revolution. Information Systems Journal, 33(4), 733–757. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12422

11. Mepham, B., Kaiser, M., Thorstensen, E., Tomkins, S., & Millar, K. (2006). Ethical Matrix Manual. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology - AGR FOREST METEOROL.

12. Palm, E., & Hansson, S. O. (2006). The case for ethical technology assessment (eTA). Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73(5), 543–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2005.06.002

13. Papa, R., Galderisi, A., Vigo Majello, M. C., & Saretta, E. (2015). Smart and Resilient Cities a Systemic Approach for Developing Cross-Sectoral Strategies in the Face of Climate Change. Tema-Journal of Land Use Mobility and Environment, 8, 19–49. https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/2883

14. Rotolo, D., Hicks, D., & Martin, B. R. (2015). What is an emerging technology? Research Policy, 44(10), 1827–1843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.06.006

15. Sardar, Z. (2010). The Namesake: Futures; futures studies; futurology; futuristic; foresight—What’s in a name? Futures, 42(3), 177–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2009.11.001

16. SATORI CEN Workshop Agreement. (2017). Ethics assessment for research and innovation—Part 2: Ethical impact assessment framework (CEN CWA 17145-2 2017 Workshop Agreement). http://satoriproject.eu/media/CWA17145-23d2017.pdf

17. Stahl, B. C., Heersmink, R., Goujon, P., Flick, C., van den Hoven, J., Wakunuma, K., Ikonen, V., & Rader, M. (2010). Identifying the Ethics of Emerging Information and Communication Technologies: An Essay on Issues, Concepts and Method. International Journal of Technoethics, 1(4), 20–38. https://doi.org/10.4018/jte.2010100102

18. Thornton, A. (2024). Our Futures in Mind Uploading: Public Perceptions and Narratives. Journal of Ethics and Emerging Tech-nologies, 34(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.55613/jeet.v34i1.140

19. Umbrello, S., Vermaas, P., Paca, C., Alliaj, G., Nishi, M., Whittington, A., Jouvenot, F., Bernstein, M.J., Mehnert, W., Buchinger, E., (2022). Tools to develop and advance scenarios dealing with the ethics of new technologies. TechEthos Project Deliverable to the European Commission. Available at: www.techethos.eu.

20. Umbrello, S., Bernstein, M. J., Vermaas, P. E., Resseguier, A., Gonzalez, G., Porcari, A., Grinbaum, A., & Adomaitis, L. (2023). From speculation to reality: Enhancing anticipatory ethics for emerging technologies (ATE) in practice. Technology in Society, 74, 102325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102325

21. Voinov, A., & Bousquet, F. (2010). Modelling with stakeholders. Environmental Modelling & Software, 25(11), 1268–1281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.03.007

22. Wright, D. (2011). A framework for the ethical impact assessment of information technology. Ethics and Information Technology, 13(3), 199–226.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30

How to Cite

An Ethical Framework for Emerging Technologies: the TEAeM Approach. (2025). Journal of Ethics and Emerging Technologies, 35(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.55613/jeet.v35i1.147

Similar Articles

1-10 of 96

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.