Navigating the Anthropocene
Responsibility Ethics as a Necessary Moral Orientation in a Transhumanist World
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55613/jeet.v34i2.162Keywords:
Anthropocene, Islamic Ethics, Responsibility Ethics, Transhumanism, Free Will, Al-Māturīdī, Kalām, Moral Philosophy, Theology and ScienceAbstract
This paper explores the intersection of Islamic ethics, the Anthropocene, and transhumanism, focusing on the necessity of integrating responsibility ethics into Islamic thought. It argues that traditional frameworks of deontological, intentional, and virtue ethics, while foundational, are insufficient to address the complex ethical dilemmas posed by globalization, environmental crises, and technological advancements. Drawing on Al-Māturīdī's theological insights, particularly his defense of free will and the concept of the "moment of inner resistance," this study proposes a responsibility ethics framework that complements traditional Islamic teachings. This framework emphasizes human autonomy, the rejection of blind imitation (taqlīd), and the necessity of considering long-term consequences. By reimagining ethical decision-making, this work highlights the potential for Islamic theology to engage with contemporary challenges, fostering a balanced coexistence of technological and spiritual progress.
References
1. Abrahamov, Binjamin. 1989. A re-examination of al-Ash‘arī’s theory of Kasb according to Kitāb al-Lumaʿ. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, 121(2): 210–221. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0035869X00109219
2. Alexander, Larry, and Michael Moore. 2021. “Deontological ethics”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edited by Edward N. Zalta. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/ethics-deontological
3. Al-Ghazzali. 2010. Al-Ghāzalī über Intention, reine Absicht und Wahrhaftigkeit: Das 37. Buch der Iḥyāʾ ʿulūm ad-dīn. Edited and translated by Hans Bauer. Nikosia: Spohr.
4. Al-Māturīdī. 2001. Kitāb At-Tawḥīd. Edited by B. Topaloğlu & M. Aruçi. Istanbul and Beirut: İrşad and Dar Sader.
5. Ardakani, Seyyed Hassan Eslami. 2012. Two Moral Arguments against Industrial Meat Consumption. Ethical Research 3(9): 267-290.
6. Arendt, Hannah. 1998. The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7. Banerji, Debashish, & Makarand R. Paranjape (eds.). 2016. Critical posthumanism and planetary futures. New Delhi: Springer India. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3637-5
8. Biermann, Frank, and Eva Lövbrand (eds.). 2019. Anthropocene encounters: New directions in green political thinking. New York: Cambridge University Press.
9. Bostrom, Nick. 2014. Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Bristow, William. 2023. “Enlightenment”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2023 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2023/entries/enlightenment
11. Bunt, Gary R. 2018. Hashtag Islam: How Cyber-Islamic Environments Are Transforming Religious Authority. University of North Carolina Press. https://doi.org/10.5149/northcarolina/9781469643168.001.0001.
12. Burdon, Peter D. 2020. Obligations in the Anthropocene. Law and Critique 31(3): 309–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-020-09273-9.
13. Cerić, Mustafa. 1995. Roots of synthetic theology in Islam: A study of the theology of Abū Manṣūr al-Māturīdī (d. 333/944). Kuala Lumpur: International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization.
14. Chung, Daisy, Ernest Scheyder, and Clare Trainor. 2023, November 15. The promise and risks of deep-sea mining: A vast treasure of critical minerals lies on the ocean floor. Should they be extracted to help fight climate change? Reuters. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/graphics/MINING-DEEPSEA/CLIMATE/zjpqezqzlpx
15. Dalby, Simon. 2016. Framing the Anthropocene: The good, the bad and the ugly. The Anthropocene Review 3(1): 33–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019615618681
16. Davies, Jeremy. 2016. The birth of the Anthropocene. Oakland: University of California Press.
17. Dhanani, Alnoor. 1994. The Physical Theory of Kalām: Atoms, Space, and Void in Basrian Muʿtazilī Cosmology. Leiden: Brill.
18. De Cillis, Maria. 2014. Free will and predestination in Islamic thought: theoretical compromises in the works of Avicenna, Ghāzālī and Ibn 'Arabī. London ; New York: Routledge.
19. Douglas, Richard M. 2021. Theodicy and the Anthropocene. Temple Tracts 22: 10–16. Retrieved from https://williamtemplefoundation.org.uk/temple-tracts
20. Field, Christopher B., Vincente R. Barros, and Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (eds.). 2014. Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability: Working group II contribution to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.
21. Fukuyama, Francis. Transhumanism. Foreign Policy 144: 42–43. Retrieved from https://foreignpolicy.com/2009/10/23
22. Ghaly, Mohammed. 2010. Islam and disability: Perspectives in theology and jurisprudence. London, New York: Routledge.
23. Gordon, Cameron. 2023. Many Possible Worlds. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
24. Herbrechter, Stefan, Ivan Callus, Manuela Rossini, Marija Grech, Megen de Bruin-Molé, and Christopher J. Müller, (eds.). 2022. Palgrave handbook of critical posthumanism. Cham: Springer International Publish-ing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04958-3
25. Hursthouse, Rosalind, and Glen Pettigrove. "Virtue Ethics." The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2023 Edition). Ed-ited by Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman. URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2023/entries/ethics-virtue.
26. Jonas, Hans. 1984. The imperative of responsibility: In search of an ethics for the technological age. Chicago: University of Chi-cago Press.
27. Jonas, Hans. 2003. Das Prinzip Verantwortung: Versuch einer Ethik für die technologische Zivilisation. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
28. Joy, Bill. 2000, April. Why the future doesn’t need us. Wired. Retrieved from https://www.wired.com/2000/04/joy-2/
29. Kam, Hureyre. 2019. Das Böse als Gottesbeweis: Die Theodizee al-Māturīdīs im Lichte seiner Epistemologie, Kosmologie und Ontologie. Berlin: EB-Verlag.
30. Kant, Immanuel. 1998. Critique of Pure Reason. The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant. Edited by Paul Guy-er, and Allen W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804649.
31. Kurzweil, Ray. 2005. The singularity is near: When humans transcend biology. New York: Viking.
32. Morris, Theresa. 2013. Hans Jonas’s Ethic of Responsibility: From Ontology to Ecology. Albany: State University of New York Press.
33. Münster, Ursula, Thomas Hylland Eriksen, and Sara Asu Schroer (eds.). 2023. Responding to the Anthropocene: Perspectives from twelve academic disciplines. Oslo: SAP, Scandinavian Academic Press.
34. Nasir, Mohamad. 2016. The Concept of ‘Taklīf’ According to Early Ash’arite Theologians. Islamic Studies 55(3/4): 291–99.
35. Nell, Ian. Leadership and spiritual resources in the Anthropocene: Some practical theological reflections. Scriptura 123(1): 1-12. https://doi.org/10.7833/123-1-2179
36. Pessagno, J. Meric. 1984. Irāda, Ikhtiyār, Qudra, Kasb: The view of Abū Manṣūr al-Māturīdī. Journal of the American Oriental Society 104(1): 177–191. https://doi.org/10.2307/602649
37. Perler, Dominik, and Ulrich Rudolph. 2000. Occasionalismus: Theorien der Kausalität im arabisch-islamischen und im europäi-schen Denken. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
38. Pollack, Detlef. 2003. Studien zum religiösen Wandel in Deutschland und Europa. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
39. Rahman, Mahfujur, Mohd Razimi, Ahmad Ariffin, and Norkhairiah Hashim. “Navigating Moral Landscape: Islamic Ethi-cal Choices and Sustainability in Halal Meat Production and Consumption.” Discover Sustainability 5(1): 225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00388-y.
40. Roldán Romero, Vanesa. 2022. Transhumanism and the Anthropocene in Becky Chambers’ A Closed and Common Or-bit. Revista de Estudios Norteamericanos 26: 77–106. https://doi.org/10.12795/REN.2022.i26.04
41. Rudolph, Ulrich. 1997. Al-Māturīdī und die sunnitische Theologie in Samarkand. Leiden: Brill.
42. Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter. 2023. “Consequentialism”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2023 Edition), edit-ed by Edward N. Zalta and Uri Nodelman. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2023/entries/consequentialism
43. Sorgner, Stefan L. 2021. On trans-humanism. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
44. Steffen, Will, Paul J. Crutzen, and John R. McNeill. The Anthropocene: Are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature? AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment 36(8): 614–621. https://doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[614:TAAHNO]2.0.CO;2
45. Tucker, Mary E. and John Grim (eds.). 2001. Religion and ecology: Can the climate change? Dædalus 130 (4).
46. Tucker, Mary E., and John Grim (eds.). 1994. Worldviews and ecology: Religion, philosophy, and the environment. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books.
47. Ess, Josef van. 2019. Theology and Society in the Second and Third Centuries of the Hijra: A History of Religious Thought in Early Islam. Volume 4. Translated by Gwendolin Goldbloom. Handbook of Oriental Studies 116/4. Leiden: Brill, 2019.
48. Watt, W. Montgomery. 1943. The origin of the Islamic doctrine of acquisition. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 75 (3–4): 234–247. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0035869X00098452
49. Weber, Max. 2001. The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. Chicago: Fitzroy Dearborn Publishers.
50. Zemmin, Florian. 2011. Islamische Verantwortungsethik im 17. Jahrhundert: Ein Weberianisches Verständnis der Handlungs-vorstellungen Katib Celebis (1609–1657). Berlin: EB-Verlag.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Hureyre Kam
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) after publication, while providing bibliographic details that credit JEET (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
