Transhumanism as a Challenge for Islamic Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55613/jeet.v34i2.158Keywords:
Islamic law, transhumanism, Islamic ethics and philosophy of lawAbstract
The Islamic legal tradition states that God and his Prophet Muhammad teach true knowledge and practice through revelation. The discipline that engages with the revelatory sources and the derivation of norms and rules from them and extending them to related and new issues is Islamic law. In this discipline, religious scholars reflect on the legitimacy of the believers’ actions and categorize them accordingly. Societal and technological advancements are influencing this norm derivation process. For instance, medical technologies enable to cure diseases through e.g. medication and organ transplantation. As believers want to live up to certain principles of their religion, these developments require reflection from a (religious-)ethical point of view in order to determine under which circumstances to follow these developments is justified. Transhumanist enhancement, for instance, pose a challenge for this religious reflection, since it challenges the way of human existence and life as we experience(d) it in the history of humanity. After presenting the main principles and ethical bases of Islamic law, the article will discuss the Islamic legal concept of responsibility, physical integrity (ḥurma) and body with regard to transhumanistic challenges. The discussion will show that the bodily experience and existence of humans is one of the major aspects of the systematic of Islamic law. The idea of transcending the human body challenges the core systematic of Islamic law, including rituals like prayer, fasting, and pilgrimage. On the other hand, Islamic law has a structure that allows flexible and dynamic solutions that do not result automatically in a positive or negative evaluation of transhumanistic enhancement and allows interdisciplinary evaluation to which I will refer in three fictitious cases of transhumanistic enhancement. This will allow us to see that Islamic law is dependent on philosophical, theological, ethical, sociological, medical, and biological reflections on transhumanistic concepts that allows a plurality of approaches to transhumanism.
References
(Al-Ghazālī 2000) Al-Ghazālī. 2000. The Incoherence of the Philosophers: Tahāfut al-Falāsifa. Translated, introduced, and annotated by Mihael E. Marmura. Utah: Brigham University Press.
(al-Khaṭīb 2019) al-Khaṭīb, Muʿtazz. 2019. Min al-muqāraba al-fiqhiyya ilā l-muqāraba al-aḫlāqiyya: al-Iǧtihād al-muʿāṣir wa-ǧīnūm namūḏaǧan. Journal of Islamic Ethics 3:90–127.
(Ali 2010) Ali, Kecia. 2010. Marriage and Slavery in Early Islam. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(Averroës 2008). Averroës. 2008. The Book of the Decisive Treatise. Translation with introduction and notes by Charles E. Butterworth. Chicago: Brigham University Press.
(Bardakoğlu 1992) Bardakoğlu, Ali. 1992. Berâet. In Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslam Ansiklopedisi. Istanbul: Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı, vol. 5, pp. 470–471 (https://islamansiklopedisi.org.tr/beraet--fikih).
(Bostrom and Sandberg 2009). Bostrom, Nick, and Anders Sandberg. 2009. Cognitive Enhancement: Methods, Ethics, Regulatory Challenges. Science and Engineering Ethics 15:311–341 (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-009-9142-5).
(Bostrom 2014) Bostrom, Nick. 2014. Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(Doko 2023) Doko, Enis. 2023. Islamic Classical Theism and the Prospect of Strong Artificial Intelligence. İlahiyat Studies 14:85-105 (https://doi.org/10.12730/is.1283109).
(Elmahjub 2021) Elmahjub, Ezieddin. 2021. Islamic Jurisprudence as an Ethical Discourse: An Enquiry into the Nature of Moral
Reasoning in Islamic Legal Theory. Oxford Journal of Law and Religion 10:16–42 (doi 10.1093/ojlr/rwaa023).
(Elmahjub 2023) Elmahjub, Ezieddin. 2023. Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Islamic Ethics: Towards Pluralist Ethical Benchmarking for AI. Philosophy & Technology 36:73 (https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-023-00668-x)
(Fahrenbach 1972) Fahrenbach, Helmut. 1972. Deontologie. In Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie. Edited by J. Ritter. Basel: Schwabe Verlag (DOI: 10.24894/HWPh.629)
(Fakhry 1994) Fakhry, Majid F. 1994. Ethical Theories in Islam. Leiden: Brill.
(Ferrando 2018) Ferrando, Francesca. 2018. Transhumanism/Posthumanism. In Posthuman Glossary. Edited by Braidotti, Rosi, and Maria Hlavajova. New York/London: Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 438–39.
(Fukuyama 2002) Fukuyama, Francis. 2002. Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution. New York: Farrar, Strausand Giroux.
(Gad Makhlouf 2020) Gad Makhlouf, Ahmed. (2020). Evolution of Islamic Law in the 20th Century: The Conception of Collective Ijtihād in the Debate Between Muslim Scholars. In Oxford Journal of Law and Religion 9:157–178.
(Ghaly 2019) Ghaly, Mohammed. (2019). Islamic Ethics and the Genome Question. Leiden: Brill. https://brill.com/display/title/54256
(Gilliot 2018) Gilliot, C. (2018). Traditional Disciplines of Qurʾānic Studies. In Encyclopaedia of the Qurʾān Online. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/1875-3922_q3_EQCOM_00207
(Gimaret 2012). Gimaret, Daniel. 2012. Muʿtazila. In Encyclopaedia of Islam New Edition Online. Edited by P. Bearman. Leiden: Brill. (https://doi.org/10.1163/1573-3912_islam_COM_0822)
(Gleave 2013) Gleave, Robert. 2013. Islam and Literalism: Literal Meaning and Interpretation in Islamic Legal Theory. Edinburgh: Edin-burgh University Press.
(Gramlich 1992) Gramlich, Richard. (1992). Islamische Mystik. Sufische Texte aus zehn Jahrhunderten. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
(Hallaq 1997) Hallaq, Wael B. 1997. Islamic Legal Theories: An Introduction to Sunni Uṣūl al-fiqh. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(Hallaq 2009) Hallaq, Wael B. 2009. Sharīʿa: Theory, Practice, Transformations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(Hildebrandt 2007) Hildebrandt, Thomas. 2007. Neo-Muʿtazilismus? Intention und Kontext im modernen arabischen Umgang mit dem rationalistischen Erbe des Islam. Leiden/Boston: Brill.
(Homerin 2006) Homerin, Thomas Emil. 2006. Soul. In Encyclopaedia of the Qurʾān. Edited by Jane Dammen McAuliffe. Leiden: Brill, vol. 5, pp. 80–84 (https://doi.org/10.1163/1875-3922_q3_EQSIM_00398).
(Hügli and Han 2001) Hügli, Anton, and Byung-Chul Han. 2001. Utilitarismus. In Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie. Edited by J. Ritter, K. Gründer, and G. Gabriel. Basel: Schwabe Verlag (DOI: 10.24894/HWPh.4518).
(Ibn Rushd 2000) Ibn Rushd. 2000. The Distinguished Jurist’s Primer. Translated by Imran Ahsan Khan Nyazee, revised by Mo-hammad Abdul Rauf. Vol. 1. Reading: Garnet Publishing.
(Johansen 1999) Johansen, Baber. Der ʿiṣma-Begriff im hanafitischen Recht. In Contingency in a Sacred Law: Legal and Ethical Norms in the Muslim Fiqh. Edited by Baber Johansen. Leiden: Brill, 238–262.
(Juynboll and Brown 2012) Juynboll, G.H.A., and D. W. Brown. 2012. Sunna. In Encyclopaedia of Islam New Edition Online. Edited by P. Bearman. Leiden: Brill. (https://doi.org/10.1163/1573-3912_islam_COM_1123).
(Kam 2023) Kam, Hureyre. 2023. New Bottles for Old Wine? On Playing God: Post- and Transhumanism from the Perspective of Kalām. Journal of Posthuman Studies 7:24-50 (https://doi.org/10.5325/jpoststud.7.1.0024).
(Kam 2024) Kam, Hureyre. 2024. The Matrix: A Modern-Day Metaphor for Spiritual Truth? Islamic Theological Reflections on the Simulation Hypothesis. Journal of Muslims in Europe 13:1–16 (doi:10.1163/22117954-bja10105).
(Kamali 2003) Kamali, Mohammad Hashim Kamali. 2003. Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence. Cambridge: The Islamic Texts Society.
(Kartal Soysal 2023) Kartal Soysal, Esra. 2023. The Production of Human Reproduction: Impacts of Transhumanism’s Inconsistent Reproductive Policy on Classical Ethical Principles. In İlahiyat Studies 14:10–50 (DOI: 10.12730/is.1199398).
(Katz 2017) Katz, Marion Holmes. 2017. Gender and law. In Encyclopaedia of Islam Three Online. Edited by Fleet, K., G. Krämer, D. Matringe, J. Nawas, and D. J. Stewart. Leiden: Brill. (https://doi.org/10.1163/1573-3912_ei3_COM_27397)
(Katz 2022) Katz, Marion Holmes. 2022. Wives and Work: Islamic Law and Ethics Before Modernity. New York: Columbia University Press.
(Khadiga 2014) Khadiga, Musa. 2014. Legal Maxims as a Genre of Islamic Law. Origins, Development and Significance of Al-Qawāʿid al-Fiqhiyya. Islamic Law and Society 21:325–365.
(Krawietz 1991) Krawietz, Birgit. 1991. Die Ḥurma: Schariatrechtlicher Schutz vor Eingriffen in die körperliche Unversehrtheit nach arab-ischen Fatwas des 20. Jahrhunderts. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
(Krawietz 2012) Krawietz, Birgit. 2012. Body, in law. In Encyclopaedia of Islam Three. Edited by Kate Fleet et al (https://doi.org/10.1163/1573-3912_ei3_COM_23722).
(Kurnaz 2017) Kurnaz, Serdar. 2017. Who is the Lawgiver? The Hermeneutical Grounds of the Methods of Interpreting Qur’an and Sunna (istinbāṭ al-aḥkām). Oxford Journal of Law and Religion 6:347–371 (https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rwx007).
(Kurnaz 2022) Kurnaz, Serdar. 2022. Tahara. In Routledge Handbook of Islamic Ritual and Practice. Edited by Oliver Leaman. London: Routledge, pp. 285–304.
(Lusiana et al 2024) Lusiana, Muhammd Harun, Ema Fathimah, and Wasti Indah Haryani Daulay. 2024. Challenges and Threats of Artificial Intelligence in Maqasid Sharia Perspective. KnE Social Sciences 470– 483 (doi 10.18502/kss.v9i2.15004).
(Madelung 2012). Madelung, Wilferd. 2012. S̲h̲īʿa. In Encyclopaedia of Islam New Edition Online. Edited by P. Bearman. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/1573-3912_islam_SIM_6920
(Melchert and Afsaruddin 2018) Melchert, C. and A. Afsaruddin. Reciters of the Qurʾān. In: Encyclopaedia of the Qurʾān Online. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/1875-3922_q3_EQCOM_00169
(Monnot 2012) Monnot, G. (2012). Ṣalāt. In Encyclopaedia of Islam New Edition Online. Edited by P. Bearman. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/1573-3912_islam_COM_0983
(More and Vita-More 2013) More, Max, and Natasha Vita-More (eds.). 2013. The Transhumanist Reader: Classical and Contemporary Essays on the Science, Technology, and Philosophy of the Human Future. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
(Müller 2022) Müller, Christian. 2022. Recht und historische Entwicklung der Scharia im Islam. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter.
(Opwis 2005) Opwis, Felicitas. 2005. Maṣlaḥa in Contemporary Islamic Legal Theory. Islamic Law and Society 12:182–223.
(Opwis 2010) Opwis, Felicitas. 2010. Maṣlaḥa and the Purpose of the Law: Islamic Discourse on Legal Change from the 4th/10th to 8th/14th Century. Leiden/Boston: Brill.
(Reinhart 1990) Reinhart, Kevin A. 1990. Impurity/No Danger. History of Religions 30:1–24 (https://www.jstor.org/stable/1062790).
(Reinhart 1995) Reinhart, Kevin A. Before Revelation: The Boundaries of Muslim Moral Thought. Albany: State University of New York Press.
(Rifai 2024) Rifai, Sulaiman Lebbe. 2024. AI, biotechnology, and the general philosophy of Islamic law (https://ssrn.com/abstract=4735284 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4735284).
(Rohe 2015) Rohe, Mathias. 2015. Islamic Law in Past and Present. Leiden/Boston: Brill.
(Rudolph 2019) Rudolph, Ulrich. 2019. Al-Ghazālī on Philosophy and Jurisprudence. In Philosophy and Jurisprudence in the Islamic World. Edited by Peter Adamson. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 67–91 (https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110552386-006).
(Sachedina 2009) Sachedina, Abdulaziz. 2009. Islamic Biomedical Ethics: Principles and Application. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(Sorgner 2020) Sorgner, Stefan Lorenz. 2020. On Trans-Humanism. Translated by Spencer Hawkins. Pennsylvania : The Pennsyl-vania State University Press.
(Tsourlaki 2022) Tsourlaki, Sofia. 2022. Artificial Intelligence on Sunni Islam’s Fatwa Issuance in Dubai and Egypt. Islamic Inquiries 1:107-125 (doi: 10.22034/IS.2022.339182.1082).
(Vishanoff 2020) Vishanoff, David R. 2020. The Ethical Structure of Imām al-Ḥaramayn al-Juwaynī’s Legal Theory. In Islamic Law and Ethics. Edited by David R. Vishanoff. London/Washington: International Institute for Islamic Thought, pp. 1–33.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Serdar Kurnaz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) after publication, while providing bibliographic details that credit JEET (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
