Misinformation Research at the National Science Foundation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55613/jeet.v35i1.188Keywords:
misinformation, disinformation, artificial intelligence, ethics, National Science FoundationAbstract
Promotion of misinformation online has become common, usually defined as false or inaccurate assertions without clear motivation, in contrast to unethical disinformation that is consciously intended to mislead. However, misinformation raises ethical questions, such as how much obligation a person has to verify the factual truth of what they assert, and how many cases were intentional falsehoods that simply could not be proven to come from liars. Since the beginning of the current century, the National Science Foundation supported much research intended to understand misinformation’s social dynamics and develop tools to identify and even combat it. Then in 2025, the second Trump administration banned such research, even cancelling many active grants that funded academic projects. Examination of representative research identifies ethical debates, the cultural differences across the relevant divisions of NSF, and connections to related questions such as the human implications of artificial intelligence. This clear survey of the recent history of research on false information offers the background to support future science and public decisions about what new research needs to be done.
References
Alpert, Harry. 1954. The National Science Foundation and social science research. American Sociological Review, 19(2): 208-211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2088403
Alpert, Harry. 1955. The social sciences and the National Science Foundation: 1945-1955. American Sociological Review, 20(6): 653-661. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2088669
Alpert, Harry. 1957. The social science research program of the National Science Foundation. American Sociological Review, 22(5): 582-585. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2089486
Brooks, Harvey. 1973. Knowledge and action: the dilemma of science policy in the ‘70’s. Daedalus, 102(2): 125-143.
Carter, Luther J. 1979. More stress on applied science at NSF, Science, 205(4407): 675-676. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.205.4407.675
Conover, Michael D., Bruno Gonçalves, Alessandro Flammini and Filippo Menczer. 2012. Partisan asymmetries in online political activity. EPJ Data Science, 1(6), epjdatascience.springeropen.com/articles/10.1140/epjds6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds6
England, J. Merton. 1983. A Patron for Pure Science: The National Science Foundation’s Formative Years, 1945-57. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
Freeman, Peter A., W. Richards Adrion and William Aspray. 2019. Computing and the National Science Foundation, 1950-2016. New York: ACM. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3336323
Gehrke, Johannes, Raghu Ramakrishnan and Venkatesh Ganti. 2000. RainForest - a framework for fast decision tree construction of large datasets. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 4: 127-162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009839829793
Golder, Scott A., and Michael W. Macy. 2014. Digital footprints: opportunities and challenges for online social research. Annual Review of Sociology, 40: 129-152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043145
Hubeny, Tyler J., Lea S. Nahon, Nyx L. Ng and Bertram Gawronski. 2025. Who falls for misinformation and why? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/01461672251328800 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672251328800
Kleindorfer, Paul, and Howard Kunreuther. 1983. “Misinformation and equilibrium in insurance markets.” Pp. 67-90 in Economic Analysis of Regulated Markets, edited by Jörg Finsinger. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17099-9_4
Larsen, Otto N. 1992. Milestones and Millstones: Social Science at the National Science Foundation, 1945-1991. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
McCray, W. Patrick. 2009. From lab to iPod: a story of discovery and commercialization in the post-cold war era. Technology and Culture, 50(1): 58-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.0.0222
McDaniel, Patrick, and Farinaz Koushanfar. 2023. Secure and Trustworthy Computing 2.0 vision statement. arXiv, arxiv.org/abs/2308.00623
National Research Council. 1999. Funding a Revolution: Government Support for Computing Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Solovey, Mark. 2020. Social Science for What? Battles over Public Funding for the ‘Other Sciences’ at the National Science Foundation. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12211.001.0001
Wright, Sewall. 1921. Correlation and Causation. Journal of Agricultural Research, 20: 557-585.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 William Sims Bainbridge

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) after publication, while providing bibliographic details that credit JEET (See The Effect of Open Access).