Review of ChatGPT in Scientific Research and Writing: A Beginners Guide

Authors

  • Philip Ephraim Prince Sultan University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55613/jeet.v36i1.222

Keywords:

ChatGPT, AI Ethics, research ethics, LLM, prompt engineering, science communication

References

1. Apeagyei, K. (2025). The perilous future of AI work in the Global South. Media@LSE Blog. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/medialse/2025/11/14/the-perilous-future-of-ai-work-in-the-global-south/

2. Ephraim, P. E. (2023) Book Review: Igor E. Klyukanov, Communication: A House Seen from Everywhere, New York, NY: Berghahn, 4124 – 4126

3. Ephraim, P. E. (2018). Bobi Wine Case Demonstrates the Power of Social Media. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/bobi-wine-case-demonstrates-the-power-of-social-media-102179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.64628/AAJ.rh7ewsrt3

4. Isenburg, M. V. (2023) ChatGPT for Research and Writing: A Library Perspective. https://mclibrary.duke.edu/news/chatgpt-research-and-writing-library-perspective#:~:text=ChatGPT%20is%20also%20known%20to%20fabricate%20references.,providing%20you%20with%20a%20real%20article%20citation.

5. Kwon, D. (2025) Is it OK for AI to write science papers? Nature survey shows researchers are split. Nature 641, 574-578 doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-025-01463-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-025-01463-8

6. Sinclair B.J. (2023) Letting ChatGPT do your science is fraudulent (and a bad idea), but AI-generated text can enhance inclusiveness in publishing. Current Research in Insect Science, Doi: 10.1016/j.cris.2023.100057 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cris.2023.100057

Downloads

Published

2026-03-20

How to Cite

Review of ChatGPT in Scientific Research and Writing: A Beginners Guide. (2026). Journal of Ethics and Emerging Technologies, 36(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.55613/jeet.v36i1.222

Similar Articles

1-10 of 97

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.