The Future of Worker Enhancement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55613/jeet.v35i1.150Keywords:
labor, productivity, artificial intelligence, National Science FoundationAbstract
Announced in 2016 and concluded in 2023, the Future of Work at the Human-Technology Frontier was one of the 10 Big Idea initiatives of the National Science Foundation, built on convergence of many fields of engineering and also some social and cognitive science that served primarily a supportive rather than critical role. Drawing upon extensive data from the NSF online grant abstracts system, this article considers how the United States seeks to enhance the productivity of workers, but possibly limited to abilities that enhance national economic and military competitiveness in an unstable world, rather than improving worker prosperity and social well-being. Some research exploring the wider implications of artificial intelligence and related technologies did emerge, so it receives emphasis. The data required for this study were entirely public, and further research focused on particular topics can be conducted by downloading new and expanded data from the NSF website.
References
Ajunwa, Ifeoma. 2021. “An Auditing Imperative for Automated Hiring Systems,” Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, 34(2), par.nsf.gov/servlets/purl/10267581
Baumgart-McFarland, Madison, Elizabeth Chiarello, and Tayla Slay. 2022. “Reluctant Saviors: Professional Ambivalence, Cultural Imaginaries, and Deservingness Construction in Naloxone Provision,” Social Science and Medicine, 309, doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115230
Calvert, Scott, “What the Amish Can Teach America About Economic Mobility,” The Wall Street Journal, October 19, 2024, www.wsj.com/us-news/what-the-amish-can-teach-america-about-economic-mobility-25cc17b7
Davies, Nathan D., Yusra Farhat Ullah and Timothy M. Kowalewski. 2022. “A Framework for Objective Evaluation of Handheld Robotic Surgical Tools Against Patient Needs,” Proceedings of the 2022 Design of Medical Devices Conference, Minneapolis, Minnesota, asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/BIOMED/proceedings/DMD2022/84815/V001T07A003/1140657
England, J. Merton, A Patron for Pure Science: The National Science Foundation’s Formative Years, 1945-57 (Washington, DC: National Science Foundation, 1983).
Gardez, Maaz, Damilola Tobiloba Adereti, Ryan Stock and Ayorinde Ogunyiola. 2022. “In Pursuit of Responsible Innovation for Precision Agriculture Technologies” Journal of Responsible Innovation 9 (2): 224-247.
Golding, Yona T. R. 2023. “The News Media and AI: A New Front in Copyright Law,” Columbia Journalism Review, www.cjr.org/business_of_news/data-scraping-ai-litigation-lawsuit-artists-authors.php
Gonzalez, Heather B., and Jeffrey J. Kuenzi. 2012. Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education: A Primer. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
Groshen, Erica L., and Harry J. Holzer. 2019. “Improving Employment and Earnings in Twenty-First Century Labor,” The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 5(5): 1-19.
Grynbaum, Michael M., and Ryan Mac. 2023. “The Times Sues OpenAI and Microsoft Over A.I. Use of Copyrighted Work,” New York Times, www.nytimes.com/2023/12/27/business/media/new-york-times-open-ai-microsoft-lawsuit.html
Guston, David H. 2023. “Making the Most of the ‘Ethical and Societal Considerations’ in the CHIPS and Science Act,” Issues in Science and Technology, May 4, 2023, issues.org/ethical-societal-considerations-nsf-guston/
Kehrig, Matthias, and Nicolas Vincent. 2018. “The Micro-Level Anatomy of the Labor Share Decline,” NBER Working Paper Series, Working Paper 25275, www.nber.org/papers/w25275.
Kellogg, Katherine C., Melissa A. Valentine and Angèle Christin. 2020. “Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control,” Academy of Management Annals, 14(1): 366-410, doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0174
Kochan, Thomas A., and William T. Kimball. 2019. “Unions, Worker Voice, and Management Practices: Implications for a High-Productivity, High-Wage Economy,” The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 5 (5) 88-108.
Larsen, Otto N. 1992. Milestones and Millstones: Social Science at the National Science Foundation, 1945-1991. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction.
Mervis, Jeffrey. 2016. “NSF Director Unveils Big Ideas, with an Eye on the Next President and Congress,” Science, www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/05/nsf-director-unveils-big-ideas-eye-next-president-and-congress
Petridis, Savvas, Nicholas Diakopoulos, Kevin Crowston, Mark Hansen, Keren Henderson, Stan Jastrzebski, Jeffrey V Nickerson and Lydia B Chilton. 2023. “AngleKindling: Supporting Journalistic Angle Ideation with Large Language Models,” Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Article 225, pp. 1-16, doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580907
Roco, Mihail C., and Carlo D. Montemagno (eds.). 2004. The Coevolution of Human Potential and Converging Technologies. New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
Solovey, Mark. 2020. Social Science for What? Battles over Public Funding for the ‘Other Sciences’ at the National Science Foundation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Won, Jong-Seob, Reza Langari, and Nina Robson. 2021. “Numerical Finger Kinematic Models Derived from Virtual Grasping of Various Cylindrical Objects With the Family of Conic Sections,” Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics, 13(1): 014501, doi.org/10.1115/1.4048257
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 William Bainbridge
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) after publication, while providing bibliographic details that credit JEET (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
