Extraterrestrial and Other to Humans Unobservable and Incomprehensible Forms of Cognition and Morality
An X-risk or AN X-opportunity?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55613/jeet.v35i2.164Keywords:
X-risk, X-opportunity, epistemological limitations, philosophy, (astro)biology, Fermi paradoxAbstract
This paper explores whether extraterrestrial or other forms of cognition and morality that are unobservable and incomprehensible to humans constitute an existential risk (X-risk) or an existential opportunity (X-opportunity) for humanity. It is being argued that the human epistemological apparatus is fundamentally limited, rendering certain forms of life—both extraterrestrial and potentially terrestrial—imperceptible and incomprehensible (which is also a novel solution to the Fermi paradox that we propose). By integrating philosophical reasoning with empirical insights from (astro)biology, the paper examines the potential implications of interacting with such entities. It will be concluded that extra-terrestrial or other sentient forms of cognition and morality could represent both a risk and an opportunity, with the likelihood of a favorable outcome increasing in correlation with scientific progress and cognitive and moral enhancement of humanity.
References
1. Agar, Nicholas. (2010). Humanity’s End: Why We Should Reject Radical Enhancement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press’
2. Baross, J. A., Hoffman, S. E. (1985). “Submarine hydrothermal vents and associated gradient environments as sites for the origin and evolution of life.”Origins of Life and Evolution of the Biosphere, 15(4), 327–345.
3. Jablonka, E., M. J. Lamb (2005). Evolution in Four Dimensions: Genetic, Epigenetic, Behavioral, and Symbolic Variation in the History of Life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Meadows, V. S. (2017). “Reflections on O2 as a biosignature in exoplanetary atmospheres”. Astrobiology, 17(10), 1022–1052.
5. Rakić, V. (2017a). “Moral Bioenhancement and Free Will: Continuing the Debate”. Cambridge Quarterly of Health Care Ethics, 26(3), 384-93.
6. Rakić, V. (2017b). “Compulsory Administration of Oxytocin Does Not Result in Genuine Moral Enhancement”Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy,20(3), 291–97.
7. Rakić, V. (2018). “Incentivized Goodness”. Medicine Health Care and Philosophy, 21(3), 303-. 309.
8. Rakić, V. (2024). “A non-anthropocentric solution to the Fermi paradox“. International Journal of Astrobiology, 23(e9), 1–9.
9. Rothschild, L. J., Mancinelli, R. L. (2001). “Life in extreme environments”. Nature, 409(6823), 1092–1101.
10. Schulze-Makuch, D., Irwin, L. N. (2008). Life in the universe: Expectations and constraints. Springer Science & Business Media.
11. Seager, S., Schrenk, M., Bains, W. (2012). “An astrophysical perspective on Earth-based metabolism”. Astrobiology, 12(1), 61–82.
12. Singer, P. (1981). The Expanding Circle: Ethics, Evolution, and Moral Progress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13. Walker, S. I., Davies, P. C. (2013). “The algorithmic origins of life”. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 10(79), 20120869.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Vojin Rakić, Ana Katić
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) after publication, while providing bibliographic details that credit JEET (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
