Review of Cyborg Rights. Extending Cognition, Ethics, and the Law

Authors

  • Paolo Capriati università degli studi di palermo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55613/jeet.v36i2.246

Keywords:

extended mind, extended cognition, mental privacy, mental integrity, personal integrity

Abstract

What if the Hypothesis of Extended Cognition and the Extended Mind Thesis are true? According to S. Orestis Palermos, in Cybor Rights, the acceptance of these theses implies a reconsideration of the way in which we understand mental privacy, mental integrity, and personal integrity. However, the reconsideration of these concepts could generate an undue assimilation between our thoughts and our cognitive extensions. The consequences of such an assimilation allow us to see the Hypothesis of Extended Cognition and the Extended Mind Thesis in a different light.

References

(Beer 1995) Beer, Randall D. 1995. A dynamical systems perspective on agent-environment interaction. Artificial intelligence 72(1–2): 173–215.

(Brown 2024) Brown, Cohen M. L. 2024. Neurorights, mental privacy, and mind reading. Neuroethics 17(2): 1–19.

(Clark and Chalmers 1998) Clark, Andy, and Chalmers, David. 1998. The extended mind. Analysis 58(1): 7–19.

(Kaplan 2012) Kaplan, David M. 2012. How to demarcate the boundaries of cognition. Biology & Philosophy 27(4): 545–570.

(Palermos 2025) Palermos, S. Orestis. 2025. Cyborg Rights: Extending Cognition, Ethics, and the Law. New York: Taylor & Francis.

(Tang et al. 2023) Tang, Jerry et al. 2023. Semantic reconstruction of continuous language from non-invasive brain recordings. Nature Neuroscience 26(5): 858–866.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-01

How to Cite

Review of Cyborg Rights. Extending Cognition, Ethics, and the Law. (2026). Journal of Ethics and Emerging Technologies, 36(2), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.55613/jeet.v36i2.246

Similar Articles

21-30 of 32

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.